Who said that the courts are not catching up with social media?
For ages there was a rule that said that injunctions had to be served through conventional methods, mainly because of the serious consequences for breaching them.
This rule prevented individuals (notably many celebrities among them) who were victims of harassment on social media, from obtaining an injunction against their faceless abusers as the injunction could not be served properly via conventional methods.
Until as recently as last week, the only remedy for the abused person was to quit Twitter, Facebook or Instagram with their tail behind their legs, which often was the only practical advice given to them by lawyers and the police.
This meant that the internet trolls were able to get away with harassment and abuse, carry on finding new victims or abuse the same poor victim on another social medium.
But this situation has recently changed when I asked a High Court judge to allow my firm to take advantage of new rules that permit for service of injunctions by alternative methods. The judge accepted the application and permit us to serve an injunction on a faceless abuser, via the very same social media she was using to harass my client. Read full post on injunctions served on social mediaSocial tagging: harassment injunctions lawyer > injunction to stop harassment > internet harassment injunction solicitor > online harassment legal advice > specialist twitter lawyer > stop troll injunction legal advice